Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41035389›Full record

ReviewBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2026

Neck-vein thrombosis during spaceflight.

Ulrich Limper, Jens Jordan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Neck-vein thrombosis during spaceflight.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ulrich LimperGerman Aerospace Center (DLR), Institute of Aerospace Medicine, Cologne, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9927-4180
Jens JordanGerman Aerospace Center (DLR), Institute of Aerospace Medicine, Cologne, Germany.

Funding

German Aerospace Center (DLR) 50WB2119
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spaceflight imposes unique environmental challenges, including weightlessness, increased radiation exposure and confinement, which can lead to unexpected health effects. One such example is neck-vein thrombosis, a condition rarely seen on Earth without predisposing factors such as venous catheters or infections. Although spaceflight has not previously been associated with thromboembolic events, recent cases of neck-vein thrombosis in astronauts aboard the International Space Station have raised concern. These events were detected incidentally and showed no obvious symptoms, complicating diagnosis. Retrospective studies have not found consistent biomarkers indicating a hypercoagulable state in space, but environmental factors such as weightlessness-induced venous stasis and potential endothelial damage may contribute. Oral contraceptives could promote thrombotic risk in female astronauts, although no direct link has been confirmed. Research on terrestrial models simulating space conditions has not yet provided conclusive insights into thrombosis prevention. Given the challenges in diagnosing and treating thrombosis in space, agencies such as National Aeronautics and Space Administration and European Space Agency have implemented surveillance programmes and recommended risk-mitigation strategies, including careful management of venous flow abnormalities and cautious use of anticoagulants. However, more research is needed to refine these strategies and improve safety in future deep space missions.

Indexed as

NeckSpace FlightVenous ThrombosisWeightlessnessAnticoagulantsAstronautsFemaleHumansRisk FactorsAnticoagulantsAnticoagulants < HaematologyCardiovascular < CardiologyHaemostasis < HaematologyThrombosis < Haematology

Identifiers

PMID41035389
PMCPMC12746360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.