ReviewBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2026
Neck-vein thrombosis during spaceflight.
Review in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The evolution of anticoagulants for the prevention and treatment of deep vein thrombosis.Anaesthesia and intensive care · 2026Article
- Neck-vein thrombosis during spaceflight.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Spaceflight imposes unique environmental challenges, including weightlessness, increased radiation exposure and confinement, which can lead to unexpected health effects. One such example is neck-vein thrombosis, a condition rarely seen on Earth without predisposing factors such as venous catheters or infections. Although spaceflight has not previously been associated with thromboembolic events, recent cases of neck-vein thrombosis in astronauts aboard the International Space Station have raised concern. These events were detected incidentally and showed no obvious symptoms, complicating diagnosis. Retrospective studies have not found consistent biomarkers indicating a hypercoagulable state in space, but environmental factors such as weightlessness-induced venous stasis and potential endothelial damage may contribute. Oral contraceptives could promote thrombotic risk in female astronauts, although no direct link has been confirmed. Research on terrestrial models simulating space conditions has not yet provided conclusive insights into thrombosis prevention. Given the challenges in diagnosing and treating thrombosis in space, agencies such as National Aeronautics and Space Administration and European Space Agency have implemented surveillance programmes and recommended risk-mitigation strategies, including careful management of venous flow abnormalities and cautious use of anticoagulants. However, more research is needed to refine these strategies and improve safety in future deep space missions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.