ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2025
Can the origin of biosynthetic routes be explained by a Frankenstein's monster-like spontaneous assembly of prebiotic reactants?
Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Complex and Messy Prebiotic Chemistry: Obstacles and Opportunities for an RNA World.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Molecular war and peace: the concurrent path to antibiosis and antibiotic resistance.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- Before LUCA: unearthing the chemical roots of metabolism.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025Article
- Origins of life: the possible and the actual.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Since it is easy to envision that prebiotically synthesized molecules underwent reactions comparable or even identical to those that occur in some metabolic pathways, it has been argued that biosynthetic routes emerged from the direct assembly of these prebiotic reactants. However, although in prebiotic simulation experiments several products present in extant metabolic routes may be formed at the same time, in biosynthetic pathways, the same precursor undergoes a stepwise transformation into other compounds, allowing changes of energy to occur that are necessary for the energetic independence of cells. In other words, from thermodynamic and equilibrium perspectives, the availability of many or all of the chemical components of a metabolic route does not necessarily imply that they will spontaneously be linked in linear or cyclic pathways. Although a number of chemical changes that mimic or are identical to a number of metabolic reactions may have taken place in the primitive environment, in the absence of a genetic apparatus ensuring the stability and diversification of the catalysts and hypothetical pathways, it is difficult to picture the continuity and evolution of such chains of reactions.This article is part of the theme issue 'Origins of life: the possible and the actual'.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.