Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41035293›Full record

ReviewAnesthesia and pain medicine2025

A systematic review of the respiratory effects of ultrasound-guided phrenic nerve block.

Christian Rafla, Tony Zitek, Michael Shalaby

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Anesthesia and pain medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07722052 (Diaphragmatic Ultrasound and Spirometry After Ultrasound-guided Stellate Ganglion Block), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07722052 completednot on this map

Diaphragmatic Ultrasound and Spirometry After Ultrasound-guided Stellate Ganglion Block: a Prospective Observational Study

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorJose Manuel López GonzálezRan2024 to 2026Enrolled15ConditionsStellate Ganglion Block, Diaphragm Ultrasound, Hemidiaphragmatic ParalysisArmsUltrasound-guided stellate ganglion block
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Christian RaflaDepartment of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
Tony ZitekDepartment of Emergency Medicine and Critical Care, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA.
Michael ShalabyDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ultrasound-guided phrenic nerve blocks (UPNBs) have emerged as a promising intervention for clinical conditions involving the diaphragm and adjacent structures. However, UPNB is often understood as an unintended but potentially critical complication of interscalene brachial plexus block (ISB) rather than a planned procedure. Therefore, we review the existing data on the effectiveness of UPNBs in enhancing respiratory functioning. We searched Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for clinical data related to UPNBs up until May 2025. The primary outcome of this review was to determine the impact of UPNB in minimizing dyspnea or desaturation among patients. Secondary outcomes included UPNB's effectiveness in reducing the intensity and frequency of hiccups and enhancing pulmonary function testing (PFT) and arterial blood gas (ABG) values. Twenty-six studies met the inclusion criteria. The findings show that UPNB does not induce or worsen dyspnea among patients. The injection produced better saturation, with some studies reporting 99% and 96% - 100% oxygen saturation. Besides, phrenic nerve block injection is vital in reducing diaphragmatic pain. Patients who exhibited intractable or persistent hiccups had their frequency and severity reduced or vanished after the nerve block injection. Our findings show that UPNB positively affected ABG samples (fair PaO2, PaCO2, and arterial pH) and spirometry/PFT values (fair FEV1, FVC, and PEF). UPNB enhanced oxygen saturation, reduced intractable hiccups, and preserved PFT and ABG values. Additionally, UPNB did not induce or worsen dyspnea and desaturation. Nevertheless, more clinical trials are needed to confirm these findings.

Indexed as

AnalgesiaDiaphragmDyspneaNerve blockOxygen saturationPhrenic nerve

Identifiers

PMID41035293
PMCPMC12611511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.