Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41035282›Full record

Trial reportCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2025

Population Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Modeling for the Prediction of the Extended Amlitelimab Phase 3 Dosing Regimen in Atopic Dermatitis.

Gilles Tiraboschi, Kim Papp, Thomas Bieber, Stephan Weidinger, Lisa Beck, Chih-Hung Lee, John T O'Malley, Karl Yen, Charlotte Bernigaud, David Fabre and 1 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Trial report in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Gilles TiraboschiSanofi, Montpellier, France.
Kim PappAlliance Clinical Trials and Probity Medical Research, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9557-3642
Thomas BieberChristine Kühne-Center for Allergy Research and Education, Medicine Campus, Davos, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-8800-3817
Stephan WeidingerDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3944-252X
Lisa BeckDepartment of Dermatology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8452-667X
Chih-Hung LeeDepartment of Dermatology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-9804-3874
John T O'MalleyFormerly Sanofi, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9968-1517
Karl YenSanofi, Rotkreuz, Switzerland.ORCID 0009-0002-2337-2045
Charlotte BernigaudSanofi, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4563-8927
David FabreSanofi, Montpellier, France.
Fabrice HurbinSanofi, Montpellier, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Amlitelimab is a fully human, nondepleting, anti-OX40 ligand monoclonal antibody being investigated for the treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) in adults and adolescents. Population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic-Eczema Area and Severity Index (PopPK/PD-EASI) models were used to inform dosing regimen selection for amlitelimab phase 3 trials. The PopPK model was developed using phase 1 (healthy volunteers) and phase 2 (participants with AD) trial data, including individual exposure variables from the STREAM-AD phase 2b trial following subcutaneous amlitelimab doses ranging from 62.5 to 250 mg given every 4 weeks (Q4W). The PopPK model was used to compute exposures for an extended dosing regimen of 250 mg Q12W (with 500 mg loading dose [+LD]). The PopPK/PD-EASI model was developed from phase 2 trials to predict treatment responses (EASI values) with selected dosing scenarios. Finally, the dose for individuals with lower body weight (i.e., < 40 kg) was determined. Utilizing the PopPK model, the amlitelimab 250 mg Q12W + LD computed exposures were between the exposures of 62.5 mg Q4W and 250 mg Q4W + LD efficacious doses in the STREAM-AD trial. Using the PopPK/PD-EASI model, the simulated efficacy for dosing scenarios of 250 mg Q12W + LD regimen from initiation or 250 mg Q4W + LD for 24 weeks followed by Q12W to Week 60 was similar to continuous 250 mg Q4W. Simulations identified that a twofold dose reduction would allow participants < 40 kg to achieve amlitelimab exposures within the range observed in participants ≥ 40 kg on 250 mg Q4W or Q12W. These results support evaluation of a Q12W dosing regimen for adults and adolescents in phase 3 trials.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedDermatitis, AtopicModels, BiologicalAdolescentAdultDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSeverity of Illness IndexYoung AdultAntibodies, Monoclonal, Humanizedclinical trialsinflammationmodelingpopulation pharmacokineticspopulation pharmacokinetics‐pharmacodynamics

Identifiers

PMID41035282
PMCPMC12706413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.