ArticleAnimal bioscience2026
Prediction models established for net energy and standardized ileal digestible amino acids in regionally sourced fermented soybean meal for growing pigs.
Article in Animal bioscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Models for energy utilization of feeds for nursery and growing pigs based on conventional and multi-sample simultaneous in vitro procedures.Animal bioscience · 2026Article
- Drying Temperature Dictates Ileal Amino Acid Digestibility of Enzyme-Treated Soybean Meal in 25 kg Pigs.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe study was conducted to determine the available energy and standardized ileal digestibility (SID) of amino acid (AA) in fermented soybean meal (FSBM), and establish prediction equations for growing pigs.
methodsIn Exp. 1, to determine available energy, twenty-four growing barrows (initial body weight = 35.3±3.2 kg) were randomly assigned to two replicated 6×6 Latin square designs, each comprising one corn-based basal diet (used in both squares) and five test diets. In Exp. 2, on AA digestibility, twenty-two growing barrows (initial body weight: 48.8± 2.8 kg) underwent distal ileal T-cannulation and were arranged to a 3-period crossover design with one nitrogen-free diet and 10 test diets. The inclusion levels of FSBM in the test diets of Exp. 1 and Exp. 2 were 27.49% and 40%, respectively.
resultsThe coefficients of variation among FSBM for ether extract (EE), crude fiber (CF), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), and acid detergent fiber (ADF) all exceeded 10%. The digestible energy, metabolizable energy, and net energy (NE) values of FSBM ranged from 15.50 to 18.44 MJ/kg dry matter (DM), 13.98 to 16.72 MJ/kg DM, and 10.10 to 11.05 MJ/kg DM, respectively. The SID values of AA demonstrated variation (p<0.05) for most AA, with the exception of Arg and Lys among indispensable AA, and Glu, Ser, and Tyr among dispensable AA. The best-fitted prediction equation for NE was a model incorporating EE, NDF, and gross energy (R = 0.92, p<0.01), while the best-fitted equations for SIDCrude Protein and SIDLys incorporated DM, NDF, and ADF (R = 0.71, p = 0.097) and CF, ADF, and Ash (R = 0.83, p = 0.022), respectively.
conclusionThe NE values of FSBM ranged from 10.10 to 11.05 MJ/kg DM. The NE value, SIDCrude Protein, and SIDLys of FSBM can be well predicted based on nutritional parameters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.