ArticleEpidemiology and health2025
Explainable SHAP-XGBoost models for identifying important social factors associated with the atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk score using the LASSO feature selection technique.
Article in Epidemiology and health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating multiple hematologic inflammatory indices into a principal component analysis-derived inflammatory burden score for coronary artery disease.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Review
- Predicting cardiovascular diseases using imbalanced data: An XGBoost-based analysis of the 2022 BRFSS dataset.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2026Article
- A multiscale geospatial analysis integrating explainable machine learning to characterize spatial disparities in melanoma mortality associated with environmental justice and healthcare access in the contiguous United States.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesExtensive evidence indicates that social factors play an essential role in explaining atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). This study aimed to examine which social factors are associated with the estimated 10-year ASCVD risk score among male and female adults, incorporating both multifaceted social network components and conventional risk factors.
methodsUsing data from 4,368 middle-aged Korean adults, we explored factors most likely to explain ASCVD risk with interpretable machine learning algorithms. The ASCVD risk was determined using the 10-year ASCVD risk score, as calculated using pooled cohort equations. Social network components were assessed through the name generator module. A total of 52 variables were included in the model.
resultsFor male participants (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC], 0.65), the average years known for network members contributed most to ASCVD risk prediction (mean Shapley additive explanations value, 0.31), followed by spouse's education level (0.22), medical history with diagnosis (0.18), and snoring frequency (0.14). By contrast, for female participants (AUC, 0.60), medical history with diagnosis was the strongest predictor (0.47), followed by logged income (0.21), education level (0.19), and the average number of years known in network members (0.17).
conclusionsSeveral important social factors were associated with the ASCVD risk score in both male and female adults. However, longitudinal research is needed to determine whether these factors predict future ASCVD events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.