ArticleCancer research and treatment2026
Impact of Occupational Lead Exposure on Lung Cancer Risk in Korean Male Workers: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in Cancer research and treatment, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: In 2006, the International Agency for Research on Cancer reported that inorganic lead is carcinogenic in animals but with limited evidence in humans. In addition, some studies have reported that exposure to lead increases the risk of lung cancer, but this remains controversial. Therefore, we aimed to assess the risk of developing lung cancer according to blood lead (PbB) levels in workers with occupational lead exposure. Materials and Methods: A retrospective cohort study of male workers with 2009 PbB concentrations was conducted using nationwide special health examination data from 2009 to 2021 and cancer registry data from 1999 to 2020 from the Republic of Korea. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) for lung cancer risk at each PbB level were calculated with a 5-year wash-out period, adjusting for age, smoking status, duration of exposure, and the number of co-exposures to lung carcinogens. Results: The study included 26,092 workers with an average follow-up period of 9.98 years. Compared with workers with PbB levels < 3.130 μg/dL, the adjusted SIRs for lung cancer risk were 2.95 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.47 to 5.27) and 3.13 (95% CI, 1.82 to 5.00) for workers with PbB levels of 3.130-4.899 and ≥ 4.900 μg/dL, respectively, indicating a significant dose-response trend. Conclusion: This study demonstrates a significant association between lead exposure and an increased risk of lung cancer, highlighting the need for stronger occupational health policies and ongoing monitoring of workers exposed to lead. The observed dose-response relationship underscores the importance of reassessing current occupational safety standards and strengthening measures to reduce lead exposure in the workplace.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.