Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41035213›Full record

ArticleEwha medical journal2025

Personalized perioperative pain management: a narrative review.

Min Kyoung Kim, Hyun Kang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ewha medical journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Min Kyoung KimDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Hyun KangDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Perioperative pain management has shifted from standardized, procedure-based protocols toward individualized, patient-centered approaches. Inadequate pain control can result in short-term adverse outcomes, including delayed ambulation, prolonged hospitalization, and increased complications, as well as long-term sequelae such as chronic persistent postsurgical pain. Early models of preemptive and preventive analgesia emphasized pain relief primarily through the use of opioids. Growing concern about opioid-related adverse effects established the basis for multimodal and opioid-sparing strategies. Nevertheless, with the onset of the global opioid crisis, heightened awareness of the risks of opioid overuse has fueled interest in opioid-free techniques. However, evidence does not demonstrate that opioid-free methods are superior to opioid-sparing approaches. This underscores the importance of returning to the central goals of enhanced recovery after surgery: early restoration of function and reduction of complications. Within this framework, personalized pain management has emerged as a practical paradigm that tailors interventions to individual characteristics, including comorbidities, psychological status, pain sensitivity, and recovery objectives. This review outlines the rationale, current practices, and future directions of personalized perioperative pain management and proposes a framework for integrating new strategies into clinical care.

Indexed as

AnalgesiaEnhanced recovery after surgeryPain managementPersonalized medicine

Identifiers

PMID41035213
PMCPMC12611433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.