Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41035211›Full record

ArticleEwha medical journal2025

Two paths, one goal-uniting regional and general anesthesia for optimal surgical care: a narrative review.

Min Kyoung Kim, Oh Haeng Lee, Hyun Kang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ewha medical journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Min Kyoung KimDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Oh Haeng LeeDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Hyun KangDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The integration of regional anesthesia (RA) with general anesthesia (GA) has become a central component of multimodal strategies to improve perioperative pain management. This approach not only enhances analgesic efficacy but also reduces opioid requirements and mitigates opioid-related adverse effects. By targeting peripheral or neuraxial nociceptive pathways, RA attenuates the surgical stress response and decreases central sensitization, complementing the systemic actions of GA. The combined application of RA and GA has shown substantial benefits across a wide range of surgical procedures, including abdominal, thoracic, orthopedic, and pediatric operations. Reported advantages include improved hemodynamic stability, enhanced pulmonary function, earlier ambulation, faster gastrointestinal recovery, and greater patient satisfaction. Moreover, recent evidence indicates a positive association between effective postoperative pain control and long-term outcomes, such as reduced incidence of persistent postsurgical pain, better functional independence, and even improved immune function and survival following cancer surgery. The development of sustained-release local anesthetic delivery systems, which provide localized and prolonged analgesia, further extends the benefits of RA-GA integration into the postoperative period. This review summarizes the mechanistic rationale, clinical applications, and future directions of RA-GA combinations in modern surgical care, with special emphasis on their role in enhanced recovery after surgery protocols.

Indexed as

AnalgesiaConduction anesthesiaEnhanced recovery after surgeryGeneral anesthesiaPostoperative pain

Identifiers

PMID41035211
PMCPMC12611430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.