ArticleEwha medical journal2025
Technologies, opportunities, challenges, and future directions for integrating generative artificial intelligence into medical education: a narrative review.
Article in Ewha medical journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- AI-supported case-based learning in medical education: a comprehensive scoping review.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Use of large language models for providing automated feedback in medical imaging education: a systematic review.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Generative AI-Assisted Microlearning for Erectile Dysfunction Myth Reduction: Single-Center Pre-Post Quasi-Experimental Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Design and Evaluation of a Faculty Development Workshop Series on Integrating Generative Artificial Intelligence in Medical Education: Mixed Methods Pilot Study.JMIR medical education · 2026Article
- Bridging the Implementation Gap in Medical AI Education: 3-Lever Framework for Concurrent Reform.JMIR medical education · 2026Article
- Bridging theory and practice in generative artificial intelligence for medical education: insights from clinical teaching experience.Ewha medical journal · 2026Article
- Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Psychological First Aid Training for Community Nurses in China: A Quasi-Experimental Study on Knowledge and Skills Enhancement.Nursing open · 2026Article
- Using virtual reality to support the transition from preclinical to clinical training in paediatric dentistry.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Benchmarking five large language models in medical genetics: a bilingual comparative evaluation using published and novel expert-authored questions.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Implementation of artificial intelligence in the 2025 medical parasitology course at Hallym University.Journal of educational evaluation for health professions · 2026Article
- A dialectical lens for AI and medical humanities: advancing responsible augmented humanism in Digital Public Health.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI), including large language models such as GPT-4 and image-generation tools like DALL-E, is rapidly transforming the landscape of medical education. These technologies present promising opportunities for advancing personalized learning, clinical simulation, assessment, curriculum development, and academic writing. Medical schools have begun incorporating GenAI tools to support students' self-directed study, design virtual patient encounters, automate formative feedback, and streamline content creation. Preliminary evidence suggests improvements in engagement, efficiency, and scalability. However, GenAI integration also introduces substantial challenges. Key concerns include hallucinated or inaccurate content, bias and inequity in artificial intelligence (AI)-generated materials, ethical issues related to plagiarism and authorship, risks to academic integrity, and the potential erosion of empathy and humanistic values in training. Furthermore, most institutions currently lack formal policies, structured training, and clear guidelines for responsible GenAI use. To realize the full potential of GenAI in medical education, educators must adopt a balanced approach that prioritizes accuracy, equity, transparency, and human oversight. Faculty development, AI literacy among learners, ethical frameworks, and investment in infrastructure are essential for sustainable adoption. As the role of AI in medicine expands, medical education must evolve in parallel to prepare future physicians who are not only skilled users of advanced technologies but also compassionate, reflective practitioners.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.