ArticleActa oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden)2025
Patient reported respiratory symptoms and lung radiation doses 11 years after loco-regional breast cancer radiation therapy in the DBCG RT Nation Study.
Article in Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeThe Danish Patient Association of Late Effects has received numerous inquiries from breast cancer (BC) survivors suspecting that adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) was the reason for respiratory symptoms. This study investigated patient-reported respiratory symptoms after locoregional RT and their association with ipsilateral lung radiation dose. Patient/material and methods: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and RT plans from BC patients treated at a single institution over 2008-2016 were collected. PROs included dyspnoea (EORTC QLQ-C30), cough (PRO-CTCAE), smoking and comorbidities. RT dose-volume metrics were registered including ipsilateral mean lung dose (MLD), and volumes receiving 5 Gy (V5) and 20 Gy (V20). Patients were stratified into MLD tertiles ('low', 'intermediate', 'high') and compared. Additionally, responders were dichotomised by dyspnoea and cough scores ('low' vs 'high'), and dose metrics were compared between symptom groups.
resultsOf 1,011 questionnaire distributed, 490 (49%) were completed and analysed. Median age was 65.8 years (interquartile range [IQR] 58.8;73.4), median time from RT to questionnaire was 11.1 years (IQR 8.9;13.2). Overall MLD was 12.9Gy (standard deviation [SD] 2.8). Any degree of dyspnoea was reported by 203 (41%) and any degree cough was reported by 175 (37%). No differences in dyspnoea/cough scores between MLD groups were found. MLD was 13.0Gy (SD 2.7) in the low dyspnoea group and 12.0Gy (SD 3.0) in the high dyspnoea group, (p = 0.04). MLD was 13.0 Gy (SD 2.7) in the low cough group and 12.5Gy (SD 3.1) in the high cough group (p = 0.23). The same pattern was found for V5lung and V20lung.
interpretationNo associations between lung dose and patient-reported respiratory symptoms were found for node-positive BC patients 11 years after RT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.