ArticleThe Journal of animal ecology2025
Resource suitability drives low use of avian-excavated tree cavities: A multi-state occupancy dynamics approach.
Article in The Journal of animal ecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A View from Inside and Outside the Tree: Using Different Techniques to Assess the Use of Black Woodpecker Cavities in Forests.Biology · 2026Article
- Resource suitability drives low use of avian-excavated tree cavities: A multi-state occupancy dynamics approach.The Journal of animal ecology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Avian tree-cavity excavators are widely held to maintain diversity of forest vertebrate faunas through the facilitation of nesting resources, and yet in many systems they are absent or redundant. Why do avian excavators sometimes supply only a small proportion of cavities used by non-excavating species? Researchers hypothesized that low re-use of excavated cavities could be driven by high rates of excavated cavity loss (low availability) or by low suitability of excavated cavities. The two hypotheses imply different cavity use dynamics. The availability hypothesis predicts high rates of excavated-cavity transition from excavators to secondary cavity-nesters. The suitability hypothesis predicts high transition rates from excavators to empty (unused), and high reuse rates for cavities previously used by secondary cavity-nesters. From 2006 to 2021, we studied 438 excavated and non-excavated bird nest cavities in the Atlantic Forest of Argentina, where excavators provide ~20% of cavities used by secondary cavity-nesters. We fit our data with a multi-state occupancy dynamics model that accounts for observation errors and estimates transition probabilities among cavity states 'Empty', 'Occupied by an excavator', 'Occupied by a secondary cavity-nester' and 'Lost'. We complemented the modelling results with a numerical simulation of cavity use dynamics. As predicted by the suitability hypothesis, the estimated probability of transition was high from excavator to empty (~0.75), low from excavator to secondary cavity-nester (~0.05) and high for reuse by secondary cavity-nester. Transition from 'Empty' to use by secondary cavity-nester was much more probable among non-excavated (~0.2) than excavated cavities (~0.05), which-our simulation shows-is compatible with secondary cavity-nesters using excavated cavities in proportion to their availability. Excavated cavities remained available for several years after their last use, suggesting suitability declines with age. We conclude that the marginal role of excavators as cavity producers is driven primarily by low suitability of their excavated cavities for other birds. Statistical support for the suitability hypothesis relied on the quantification of uncertainty about cavity states afforded by multi-state occupancy dynamics models. We encourage further exploration of state-transition probabilities among tree cavities and other multi-use resources to test ecological hypotheses and inform resource conservation policy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.