ArticleAnimal microbiome2025
Wild gut microbiome suppresses the potentially opportunistic pathogen Aeromonas in medaka under domesticated rearing conditions.
Article in Animal microbiome, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gut-Microbial Responses to Acute Polyester Microplastic Exposure in Zebrafish: Dysbiosis, Opportunistic Bacteria, and Functional Impact.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Article
- Generating gnotobiotic bivalves: a new method on Manila clam (Microbiology spectrum · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe gut microbiome plays a crucial role in the metabolic health and pathogen resistance of various host animals. It is also well established that external environmental factors can influence the gut microbiome, leading to differences in its composition. However, the functional implications of these differences remain poorly understood. This study examined the gut microbiome of medaka (Oryzias latipes species complex) by comparing domesticated and wild populations, with the aim of gaining insights into the functional significance of their specific characteristics, particularly those of the wild-type microbiome.
resultsFor the comparative analysis of the gut microbiome, 48 domesticated and 122 wild medaka were collected from multiple laboratories, pet stores and streams across Japan. The results showed that wild medaka exhibited significantly higher gut microbiome diversity, with a broader range of bacterial members. In contrast, the gut microbiome of domesticated medaka harbored lower microbial diversity and was consistently dominated by Aeromonas, a typical opportunistic pathogen in fish. Additionally, 88.6% of Aeromonas isolates from domesticated medaka exhibited haemolytic activity. Moreover, a domesticated rearing experiment with wild populations showed no proliferation or dominance of Aeromonas in their gut, as observed in domesticated medaka. A further rearing experiment revealed that pre-exposing antibiotic-treated medaka to sediments from their natural habitats prevented Aeromonas colonisation, even when reared under domesticated conditions.
conclusionsThese findings suggest that the habitat-derived wild gut microbiome can inhibit Aeromonas proliferation in domesticated fish, highlighting its potential to mitigate opportunistic diseases in aquaculture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.