Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41035098›Full record

ArticleImplementation science communications2025

Evaluating community engagement supporting LGBTQ + health in schools: adaptation and use of the collaborating with community subscale from the measure of school, family, and community partnerships.

Rachel A Sebastian, Daniel G Shattuck, Mary M Ramos, Cathleen E Willging

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rachel A SebastianPacific Institute for Research and Evaluation-Southwest, 851 University Boulevard, Albuquerque, NM, 87106, USA.
Daniel G ShattuckPacific Institute for Research and Evaluation-Southwest, 851 University Boulevard, Albuquerque, NM, 87106, USA. dshattuck@pire.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4689-863X
Mary M RamosPacific Institute for Research and Evaluation-Southwest, 851 University Boulevard, Albuquerque, NM, 87106, USA.
Cathleen E WillgingPacific Institute for Research and Evaluation-Southwest, 851 University Boulevard, Albuquerque, NM, 87106, USA.

Funding

Implementing School Nursing Strategies to Reduce LGBTI Adolescent SuicideR01HD083399 · NICHD · PACIFIC INSTITUTE FOR RES AND EVALUATION · PI RAMOS, MARY M, WILLGING, CATHLEEN E. · 2016 to 2020
$3.0M
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development R01HD83399NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD083399
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLGBTQ + youth are at elevated risk for numerous negative health and behavioral health outcomes, which largely stem from minority stress and maladaptive coping. Schools are an important environment where these youth may be exposed to both stressors, like experiences of stigma, bias, discrimination, and violence, and health promotive factors that moderate the impact of minority stress. Collaboration between schools and the broader community plays a crucial role in initiatives designed to improve school climate and culture. The purpose of this study was to validate the use of an adapted "Collaborating with Community Scale" in the context of a cluster randomized controlled trial implementing LGBTQ + supportive practices in high schools.

methodsWe conducted annual surveys over five years with an administrator and an implementation leader in each of the 42 high schools randomly assigned to either an implementation condition or a delayed implementation condition. The survey included questions on organizational leadership, implementation climate, and the CCS-LGBTQ + . We analyzed inter-rater reliability between respondent types, internal consistency, and change over time in scale items and means.

resultsScale scores between administrators and implementation leaders were strongly correlated. However, administrators rated items higher than implementation leaders. The scale demonstrated a high level of internal consistency, with Cronbach's alphas ranging from .777 to .930 and was sensitive to changes in the implementation of scale items, indicated by increases in the scale means of implementation condition schools from 1.59 in year 1 to 2.08 in year 4 (p < .035).

conclusionsTesting of the CCS-LGBTQ + resulted in a scale with high internal consistency to measure the extent to which schools collaborate with community resources to support and enhance school environments for LGBTQ + students. When used in the context of the parent trial, findings from the CCS-LGBTQ + show that schools' collaboration with community resources increased over time. However, the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic likely reversed some of the gains made within the first years of implementation. The CCS-LGBTQ + is a reliable and useful tool for assessing school-community collaboration for supporting LGBTQ + populations.

Indexed as

Bridging factorCollaborationCommunityLGBTQ +MeasurementSchool healthSchools

Identifiers

PMID41035098
PMCPMC12487175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.