Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41035081›Full record

ArticleBMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation2025

Dynamic neuromuscular stabilization, balance, and conventional training for chronic ankle instability in amateur athletes: a randomised controlled trial.

Sevval Yesilkir, Gizem Ergezen Sahin

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06296537 (Comparison of the Effectiveness of Balance Training and Dynamic Neuromuscular Stabilization Training in Amateur Athletes with Chronic Ankle Instability), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06296537 nacompletednot on this map

Comparison of the Effectiveness of Balance Training and Dynamic Neuromuscular Stabilization Training in Amateur Athletes with Chronic Ankle Instability

TypeinterventionalSponsorMedipol UniversityRan2024 to 2024Enrolled36ConditionsAnkle Inversion Sprain, Chronic Instability of Joint, Chronic Pain, Athlete FootArmsDynamic Neuromuscular Stabilization Training (DNS), Balance Training, Conventional Training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sevval YesilkirDepartment of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Graduate School of Health Sciences, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, 34810, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-4426-146X
Gizem Ergezen SahinDepartment of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, 34810, Turkey. gergezen@medipol.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2851-9774

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of this study was to compare the effects of three distinct rehabilitation approaches, namely Dynamic Neuromuscular Stabilization (DNS) training, balance training and conventional physiotherapy, on neuromuscular control and functional performance in amateur athletes with chronic ankle instability (CAI). TRIAL DESIGN AND FRAMEWORK: A single-blind, parallel-group randomized controlled trial with a superiority framework was conducted.

methodsAmateur athletes with chronic ankle instability were recruited from sports clinics in Istanbul. A total of 40 participants (18 males, 22 females) from football, gymnastics, rowing, taekwondo, tennis, volleyball, and swimming were randomly assigned (1:1:1) using a computer-generated permuted block design to DNS training (DNSG) (n = 13), balance training (BTG) (n = 14), or conventional training (CTG) (n = 13). Interventions were delivered three times per week for six weeks. DNS involved breathing-centered stabilization exercises; balance training included structured proprioceptive and vestibular tasks; and conventional training used standard strength and posture control exercises. Outcome assessors were blinded, while participants and therapist were not.

resultsA total of thirty-six participants completed the trial, with the following group distributions: DNSG (n = 12), BTG (n = 13), and CTG (n = 11). Both DNSG and BTG showed significantly greater improvements than the CTG across all outcome measures (p < 0.001), with large effect sizes (FAAM-ADL η²=0.97; YBT-A η²=0.92; SHT η²=0.95). DNS was significant in postural control (p = 0.01), while balance training showed greater improvements in reaction time (RT) (p = 0.02). No significant between-group differences were observed in CAIT scores, though DNSG and BTG demonstrated large within-group improvements. No serious harms or adverse events were reported in any of the groups.

conclusionsDNS and balance training are more effective than conventional physiotherapy in improving neuromuscular function, postural control, and performance in amateur athletes with CAI. These interventions offer complementary benefits and may be integrated into targeted rehabilitation protocols to optimize outcomes and support return-to-sport strategies.

trial registrationClinical trial approval was obtained at https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov/ , and the registration status was made publicly available with the number of NCT06296537 on February 29, 2024. The registry record can be accessed at https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06296537 . As of the time of writing, the results have not yet been published on the registry.

Indexed as

Amateur athleteBalance trainingChronic ankle instabilityDynamic neuromuscular stabilizationMotor controlSports rehabilitationVestibular training

Identifiers

PMID41035081
PMCPMC12486776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.