ArticleReproductive health2025
Quality of maternal and child health services in Tanzanian primary healthcare: a 2021-2022 star rating review.
Article in Reproductive health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTanzania faces high maternal and infant mortality rates, yet key service quality metrics remain underexamined, limiting targeted improvements. Star Rating Assessment (SRA), introduced in 2015, aims to improve primary health care (PHC) quality, including maternal and child health (MCH) services. This study analyses SRA data to assess the prevalence of PHC quality in MCH and its associated factors.
methodsData for this cross-sectional study were collected from November 2021 to March 2022 across 10 regions. The tool used included 12 MCH-related indicators, each comprising specific criteria. Facilities scoring ≥ 80% across these criteria were considered to meet MCH quality standards, which was the primary study outcome. A descriptive analysis of indicator performance was conducted, followed by multivariate logistic regression to assess characteristics associated with achieving the quality standard. Results are reported as adjusted odds ratios (AOR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).
resultsA total of 2,583 facilities assessed: 2,189 dispensaries (84.7%), 303 health centres (11.7%), and 91 district-level hospitals (3.5%). Only 280(10.8%) met the MCH quality standards. Maternal audit and review practices aligned with guidelines in 2,057 facilities (79.6%). Moderate adherence was observed for family planning guidelines (48.3%), accurate partogram completion (47.9%), and immunisation standards (46.3%). Major gaps included cervical cancer screening, offered by 199 facilities (7.7%), and essential obstetric medicines, available in 424 facilities (16.4%). Among 394 hospitals and health centres, only 60(15.2%) offered postnatal and essential newborn care with dedicated neonatal and Kangaroo Mother Care spaces. Compliance was higher in public, rural, and higher-level facilities. Nurse availability, functional management, and quality improvement teams were key predictors of MCH quality.
conclusionThe quality of MCH services in Tanzania varies widely by facility type, ownership, nurse staffing, and management functionality. Targeted improvements in cervical cancer screening, emergency obstetric care, and newborn care are essential to raise overall MCH service standards.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.