ArticleAnimal microbiome2025
A new in vitro model of the adult pig colon microbiome: application to the study of feed ingredients.
Article in Animal microbiome, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Exploring the predominant factors associated with shaping the cultivable swine gut microbiota of Wuzhishan piglets under in vitro cultivation conditions.BMC microbiology · 2026Article
- High-throughput in vitro prediction of available energy in feed ingredients for pigs using a novel computer-controlled digestion system.Journal of animal science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere is an intricate relationship between pig nutrition and gut microbiome. For technical, cost and societal reasons, in vitro gut models can be advantageously used as an alternative to in vivo experiments to perform mechanistic studies on the interactions between gut microbes and nutrients. In this context, the aim of the present study was to develop a new in vitro model of the healthy adult pig colon integrating both luminal and mucosal microenvironments. The model was further used to evaluate feed ingredients (lactose and lactose + sucrose). Gut Microbiota composition and metabolic activities were followed by 16S Metabarcoding and short chain fatty acid (SCFA) / gas measurement, respectively. Then, the effect of the both feedstuffs on skatole production, responsible for boar taint in male pigs, was also investigated.
resultsBased on in vivo data, the new MPigut-IVM was set-up to reproduce the main physicochemical (pH, transit time, self-maintained anaerobiosis), nutritional (composition of ileal effluents, bile salts) and microbial (lumen and mucus-associated microbiota) parameters of the large intestine in healthy adult pigs. The model was validated through in vitro-in vivo comparisons regarding SCFA concentrations and bacterial profiles at the phylum and family levels. Lactose and lactose + sucrose had no significant impact on SCFAs but increased gas production (P < 0.01 with lactose). Both sugars, particularly lactose + sucrose, tended to reduce skatole concentrations while increasing indole levels (P > 0.05). This was associated to a slight reduction of the numbers of skatole-producing bacteria Olsenella scatoligenes (P > 0.05). Both feed ingredients induced a decrease in bacterial α-diversity (P < 0.05).
conclusionDespite obvious limitations such as lack of host interactions, the adult MPigut-IVM represents a powerful platform for Microbiome studies in the pig colonic environment. In Line with the 3R regulations, this in vitro model can be useful to perform preliminary screening of innovative feed strategies to improve pig health and help to elucidate their mechanisms of action in relation with gut microbiota, taking into account inter-individual variabilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.