ArticleActa neuropathologica communications2025
Diffuse leptomeningeal glioneuronal tumour: molecular diagnosis, evolution and treatment.
Article in Acta neuropathologica communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diffuse leptomeningeal glioneuronal tumour (DLGNT) is rare a glioneuronal neoplasm of the central nervous system, which occurs mainly in children and adolescents characterized by the presence of MAPK pathway alteration and 1p deletion.Clinical, radiological and molecular data from 20 patients diagnosed with DLGNT from May 2001 to May 2023 were collected.Clinical presentation was polymorphous, with intracranial hypertension and back pain as most common symptoms. Patients underwent multiple lines of treatment (median of 4, range 1–8) in addition to surgery with a median follow up of 94 months (range 7–241). Radiotherapy and carboplatin-based chemotherapy were the 2 treatments with the higher number of partial response (PR) and stable disease (SD) of 7/10 and 2/10 for radiotherapy and 7/12 and 5/12 for carboplatin-based chemotherapy. All patients treated with trametinib progressed before 2 years, while 2-years PFS was of 52% (95% CI 20–77%), for carboplatin-based chemotherapy, 40% (95% CI 10–70%) for radiotherapy, 29% (95% CI 9–53%) for Temozolomide and 13% (95% CI 1–42%) for Vinblastine/Vinorelbine. Neurological sequelae concerned 70% of patients with at least on neurological impairment at last follow-up. In total, 7 patients died including 5 from disease progression. The 5-years and 10-years OS were of 88% (95% CI 59–97%) and 78% (95% CI 45–93%) respectively. Our work reports the outcome and treatment response of a retrospective cohort of DLGNT. Close monitoring appears to be the key to early treatment initiation and limiting patient disability. Further prospective studies in multi-institutional cohorts are needed to better define a standardized treatment approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.