ArticleReproductive health2025
Socio-ethical and legal issues regarding surrogacy in Ghana: a qualitative study.
Article in Reproductive health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSurrogacy has recently emerged as a crucial fertility treatment solution due to the development of in-vitro fertilization (IVF). There are however a number of socio-ethical and legal issues, including parental rights, children's basic human rights, and abuse of women, most notably surrogate exploitation. In Ghana, these socio-ethical issues have not been well studied. This study aimed to explore the socio-ethical and legal issues regarding surrogacy in Ghana.
methodA phenomenological qualitative study was conducted. A total of 13 participants comprising couples undergoing fertility treatments, surrogates, fertility specialists, lawyers, and bioethicists were selected using a combination of purposive and snowball sampling. Data were collected via in-depth interviews. In-depth interviews were tape-recorded and transcribed verbatim. A thematic content analysis approach was used to analyse the data and results were presented using quotes.
resultsThe results suggest that couples will resort to surrogacy when all treatments have failed. This decision is however influenced by age, economic status, family and societal pressure. Surrogates are both altruistically and monetarily motivated to enter into surrogacy arrangements. However, surrogacy practice in Ghana is marred with numerous ethical issues including lack of informed consent, exploitation, abuse, issues of compensation and maltreatment of surrogates. These issues are compounded by a weak legal and regulatory framework which is unable to address uncertainties and abuse.
conclusionEven though surrogacy has come to address infertility issues in infertile couple, it is faced with ethical issues and weak legal system. Specific legislation on Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ARTs) and surrogacy is urgently needed to address the uncertainties in the practice, protect the rights of surrogates, and minimize abuse. Clinical Trial Number Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.