ArticleBehavioral and brain functions : BBF2025
Motor expertise shapes crossmodal and modality-specific action representations in table tennis players.
Article in Behavioral and brain functions : BBF, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Badminton expertise shapes cue extraction and evidence accumulation during perceptual prediction.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Multivariate neuroimaging studies have shown a functional dissociation between the temporal and frontoparietal cortices in action representation. However, it remains unclear to what extent this specificity is modulated by motor experience. To address this question, we employed functional magnetic resonance imaging-based multivoxel pattern analysis (MVPA). Neural activation patterns were compared between professional table tennis players (experts) and novices during the passive observation of action videos and the reading of corresponding action-related sentences. Specifically, to identify brain regions that decode perceptual-motor information, classifiers were trained and tested within the same stimulus modality (video or sentence). To identify brain regions supporting conceptual-level action decoding, classifiers trained on video stimuli were tested on sentence stimuli, and vice versa. The results revealed that, in experts, the left lateral posterior temporal cortex (LPTC) and anterior temporal lobe (ATL) supported crossmodal action representations, whereas the left superior parietal lobule (SPL) and precentral gyrus (PreCG) exhibited modality-specific representations, particularly in response to video-based stimuli. In novices, only the PreCG showed modality-specific representations for video stimuli. These findings suggest a functional dissociation across brain regions, with the temporal cortex involved in conceptual-level representations of actions andthe SPL associated with processing perceptual-motor features. While such representations were more prominent in experts for familiar actions, the PreCG showed modality-specific representations regardless of group. These results highlight potential group-level differences in the neural encoding of action-related information, which may reflect the influence of task familiarity or prior sensorimotor experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.