Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41034970›Full record

ArticleVirology journal2025

Bayesian phylogenetic and recombination analyses of plum pox virus provide a refined vision of its evolutionary history.

F Palmisano, S Kawakubo, M Chiumenti, P Leonetti, V Pantaleo, T Candresse, A Minafra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Virology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

F Palmisano *Department of Biology Agricultural and Food Sciences, Institute for Sustainable Plant Protection, National Research Council, Bari Unit, 70126, Bari, Italy.
S Kawakubo *Research Faculty of Agriculture, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, 060-8589, Japan.
M ChiumentiDepartment of Biology Agricultural and Food Sciences, Institute for Sustainable Plant Protection, National Research Council, Bari Unit, 70126, Bari, Italy.
P LeonettiDepartment of Biology Agricultural and Food Sciences, Institute for Sustainable Plant Protection, National Research Council, Bari Unit, 70126, Bari, Italy.
V PantaleoDepartment of Biology Agricultural and Food Sciences, Institute for Sustainable Plant Protection, National Research Council, Bari Unit, 70126, Bari, Italy. vitantonio.pantaleo@cnr.it.
T CandresseUMR 1332 Biologie du Fruit Et Pathologie, INRAE - Université de Bordeaux, CS20032, 33882 cedex, Villenave d'Ornon, France.
A MinafraDepartment of Biology Agricultural and Food Sciences, Institute for Sustainable Plant Protection, National Research Council, Bari Unit, 70126, Bari, Italy. angelantonio.minafra@cnr.it.

Funding

FP7 Cooperation 204429Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JP22J22297
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe discovery of a plum tree isolate of plum pox virus (PPV, Potyvirus plumpoxi), done in Eastern Albania in 2011 in the frame of an EU-funded survey, which represents a divergent strain named PPV-An, proved to be original and informative for the unraveling of PPV evolutionary history.

methodsMaximum likelihood and Bayesian phylogenetic methods applied on full-length genomes or selected regions analyzed the affinities of the PPV-An with other PPV strains. Potential recombination events were also evaluated. A refined timeline of PPV evolutionary history integrating recombination events, strains migration and ancestral host state is proposed.

resultsAltogether, the analyses confirm previous hypotheses that PPV-An corresponds to an ancestral, non-recombinant PPV strain. PPV-An likely served as the origin of the PPV-M and T strains through recombination with isolate(s) of the D strain. Molecular clock analyses dated the most recent common ancestor (TMRCA) of PPV at 4546 years ago and phylogeny separated the main PPV strains from the cherry-adapted strains around 3100 years ago. Meanwhile, the recombination events that gave rise to the M and T strains are estimated to have occurred in the early sixteenth century of the common era (CE).

conclusionsThe characterization of the PPV-An strain enabled a comprehensive phylogenetic analysis of PPV. PPV-An is confirmed to be the previously unidentified progenitor, which, together with PPV-D led through recombination to the emergence of the currently prevalent and evolutionary successful recombinant strains of European origin (e.g., M, Rec, and T). The low representation of PPV-An in current PPV populations is likely the consequence of a population replacement phenomenon possibly linked to a higher fitness of the recombinant strains deriving from it. These results highlight the PPV-An strain as a key player in PPV evolutionary history and consolidate PPV as one of the promising models to study host-adaptive evolution processes and phylogeography among the most damaging viruses of agricultural systems.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularPhylogenyPlant DiseasesPlum Pox VirusRecombination, GeneticBayes TheoremGenome, ViralAncestorPhylogeographic inferencePlum pox virusRecombinationSharka diseaseStrain dynamics

Identifiers

PMID41034970
PMCPMC12486783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.