Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41034951›Full record

ArticleImplementation science communications2025

Using implementation mapping to optimize the impact of Universal School meals: a type III hybrid implementation-effectiveness study protocol.

Gabriella M McLoughlin, Angel Smith, Alex R Dopp, Resa Jones, Omar Martinez, Shiriki Kumanyika, Recai Yucel, Ross C Brownson, Jennifer Orlet Fisher

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06579079 (A Hybrid Type III Implementation-effectiveness Trial to Improve Implementation and Participation of Universal School Meals), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06579079 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

A Hybrid Type III Implementation-effectiveness Trial to Improve Implementation and Participation of Universal School Meals (USM)

TypeinterventionalSponsorTemple UniversityRan2025 to 2028Enrolled1,000ConditionsFood Deprivation, Obesity, ChildhoodArmsImplementation Mapping, Waitlist Comparison - Implementation Mapping
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Gabriella M McLoughlinDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Temple University College of Public Health, Philadelphia, PA, USA. gabriella.mcloughlin@temple.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7731-2382
Angel SmithDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Temple University College of Public Health, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Alex R DoppRAND, Santa Monica, CA, USA.
Resa JonesDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Temple University College of Public Health, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Omar MartinezCollege of Medicine, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA.
Shiriki KumanyikaPerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Recai YucelDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Temple University College of Public Health, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Ross C BrownsonSiteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Jennifer Orlet FisherDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Temple University College of Public Health, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Funding

Washington University Implementation Science Center for Cancer Control (WU-ISCCC)P50CA244431 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI COLDITZ, GRAHAM A. · 2019 to 2023
$8.0M
Using Implementation Mapping to Maximize Impact of School-Based Policies for Obesity PreventionK01HL166957 · NHLBI · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI Gabriella Mcloughlin · 2023 to 2026
$684k
Investigating Student-Level Outcomes of Equity-Focused Implementation Mapping in a Cluster Randomized Trial to enhance the impact of Universal School MealsR03HL178872 · NHLBI · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI MCLOUGHLIN, GABRIELLA · 2025 to 2025
$238k
CDC HHS U48DP006395NCI NIH HHS P50CA244431NHLBI NIH HHS K01 HL166957NHLBI NIH HHS K01HL166957NHLBI NIH HHS R03 HL178872NIDDK NIH HHS P30DK092950, P30DK056341, R25DK123008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProvision of government subsidized school meals at no charge to all students in income-eligible schools (Universal School Meals) is a critical policy approach to address food insecurity and risk for obesity in school-aged children. However, despite documented benefits, implementation challenges remain, which limit the uptake and associated impact of this provision. To ensure the longevity of this policy approach, equity-focused solutions that center the needs of those tasked with implementation and the most vulnerable Universal School Meals recipients are necessary. The aims of this study are to develop equity-focused implementation strategies and test them through a hybrid type III cluster-randomized trial to examine potential effectiveness on improving student uptake and implementation across the school system.

methodsAim 1 will comprise the first tasks of Implementation Mapping to co-develop implementation strategies in partnership with school implementers and recipients to ensure contextual fit within their school system. Aim 2 will comprise the final step of implementation mapping with a hybrid type III implementation-effectiveness trial to examine primary implementation and effectiveness outcomes of the applied strategies. Reach and penetration will be the primary implementation outcomes in addition to acceptability, feasibility, cost, and sustainability. Health outcomes comprise family food security, student dietary behaviors, and body mass index. Baseline, 6-month, and 12-month assessments will be recorded. A convergent (Quantitative-Qualitative) mixed methods design will be employed for analysis; exploratory hierarchical multiple regression models will be run for each behavioral outcome using students as the unit of observation and schools as the unit of analysis. Survey and interview data for implementation outcomes will be analyzed deductively according to the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment and Getting to Equity frameworks then inductively to generate overarching themes across the trial period. DISCUSSION: This implementation mapping process will yield equity-driven strategies, which can be successfully implemented in school settings to improve uptake of USM and reduce food insecurity and obesity-related disparities in high-risk youth. This study presents a rigorous and equity-driven implementation research agenda with the potential to advance school-based obesity prevention efforts by identifying, developing, and evaluating context-specific strategies that meet the needs of vulnerable student populations.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT06579079, Registered on 11-5-2024.

Indexed as

Community-engaged researchEquityFood insecurityImplementation mappingImplementation strategiesObesity policyUniversal school meals

Identifiers

PMID41034951
PMCPMC12486583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.