ArticleBMC health services research2025
Aging population challenges: enhancing healthy aging practices through virtual coaching systems.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Age-Friendly Design and Optimization of Digital Health Technologies for Medication Adherence in Older Adults With Chronic Diseases: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAs the global population ages, society faces complex challenges in healthcare provision and medical service delivery. This study focusses on the potential of supportive digital technologies, with a particular focus on Virtual Coaching Systems (VCSs), to offer innovative solutions for improving healthy aging practices. Our research extends the existing Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) by incorporating three novel external determinants: subjective norms, health literacy, and information technology literacy. These additional factors provide a more nuanced understanding of the drivers behind technology acceptance among older adults, highlighting the importance of addressing the unique needs and preferences of this population segment.
methodsDrawing on empirical evidence from a sample of 436 Italian individuals aged 60 and above, we develop a comprehensive framework and test a structural equation model that unveils the crucial role of exploiting diverse knowledge sources through VCSs in promoting healthy aging, ultimately contributing to the sustainability of national healthcare systems.
resultsIn line with the TAM, perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use have a positive and significant impact on the elderly people's intention to use a VCS. Subjective norms are not found to have a significant direct impact on the intention to use a VCS, while they have an indirect influence through perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness. Health literacy is found to have a significant but negative impact on the perceived usefulness of a VCS. On the other hand, it positively and significantly affects perceived ease of use. Finally, the results of the analysis provide support for the positive relationship between information technology literacy and perceived ease of use.
conclusionsOur findings offer valuable insights for healthcare researchers, policymakers, professionals, and digital solution providers in developing targeted strategies and interventions to support the health and well-being of the aging population. This study emphasizes the need for a collaborative approach among stakeholders to harness the potential of VCSs in addressing the multifaceted challenges arising from population aging, ultimately enhancing the quality of life for older individuals and promoting the sustainability of healthcare systems worldwide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.