ArticlePatient safety in surgery2025
Anatomic reference measures for central airway anatomy in Indian adults: implications for precision airway management in surgical patient safety.
Article in Patient safety in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comprehensive Tracheobronchial Morphometry in Korean Adults: Clinical Implications for Double-Lumen Tube Sizing and Right Upper Lobe Alignment.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite the critical role of central airway dimensions in clinical practice, comprehensive normative data remain scarce globally, particularly for diverse ethnic populations. This study aims to establish the first high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) based reference values for tracheobronchial anatomy in Indian adults, addressing a significant gap in precision medicine.
methodsThis retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted at Kasturba Hospital, Manipal, India. HRCT chest scans performed between January 1, 2021, and March 31, 2024, were screened, and 503 adults (277 males, 226 females; aged 20-80 years) with normal findings were included. Primary outcomes were normative tracheal and bronchial dimensions (lengths, diameters, cross-sectional areas). Secondary outcomes included age and gender-based variations, correlations with demographics, and predictive models for airway device selection. Inclusion criteria were HRCT scans with normal thoracic findings and adequate inspiratory effort. Exclusion criteria included thoracic, pulmonary or cardiac abnormalities, prior airway surgery, presence of airway devices, or severe imaging artifacts. Data were analysed using t-test, one-way ANOVA, Pearson correlations, and multiple linear regression. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.
resultsIndian males exhibited significantly larger airways than females (tracheal length: 109.5 ± 8.9 mm vs. 100.5 ± 7.4 mm, p < 0.001; distal tracheal area: 311.3 ± 111.1 mm² vs. 227.6 ± 92.9 mm², p < 0.001). Notably, 54.5% of subjects had a more vertical left bronchus, contradicting classical anatomical dogma. High rates of short right main bronchi (< 23 mm) were observed in 49.5% of subjects, increasing the risk of double-lumen endobronchial tube misplacement. The distal tracheal diameter was strongly correlated with bronchial dimensions (r = 0.621, p < 0.001), providing evidence-based device selection.
conclusionThis study provides the first population-specific normative data for central airway dimensions in Indian adults, revealing profound ethnic variations with immediate clinical implications for airway management, thoracic surgery, and personalised medical device design. The findings underscore the necessity of region-specific reference standards to optimise patient safety and highlight the influence of ethnicity on airway anatomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.