ArticleBMC oral health2025
Exploring high dental anxiety subtypes using cluster analysis approach: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Profiles of Fear of Root Canal Treatment in Adult Endodontic Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- What psychometric scales did researchers use to measure dental fear, anxiety, or phobia? A literature survey from 2020 to 2024.Frontiers in oral health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDental anxiety (DA) arises from exogenous learning experiences and endogenous vulnerabilities, yet little is known about how these factors combine within highly anxious adults. The aim was to identify empirical subtypes of high DA based on endo/exogenous factors and compare them according to self-reported oral health, care-seeking behavior, and preferred dental treatment conditions.
methodsA cross-sectional online survey of 399 Japanese adults (mean ± S.D. age = 43.5 ± 13.1 years; 50% women) who rated "very frightening" on the Japanese Single Dental Anxiety Question. Seven predictors were entered into a two-step cluster analysis: four exogenous variables (distressing dental and medical experiences, family DA, exposure to frightening dentists in the media) and three endogenous variables (fear of pain, pain catastrophizing, sensory-processing sensitivity). Demographics, Seattle DA classification, dental attendance pattern, self-reported oral health, and preferred treatment conditions (cognitive-behavioral therapy, conscious sedation, or general anesthesia) were compared between clusters using chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests.
resultsThe optimal solution consisted of two clusters (silhouette = 0.30, maximum/ minimum ratio = 1.31). All participants in Cluster 1 (n = 173) had experienced distressing dental treatment and showed higher pain catastrophizing (p < 0.001). No one in Cluster 2 (n = 226) reported traumatic dental events and had lower catastrophizing, fewer regular check-ups (12% vs. 24%), a higher proportion who had never visited a dentist (14% vs. 0%), and less interest in DA treatment compared to Cluster 1.
conclusionsTwo partially overlapping DA phenotypes emerged: C1 as "Trauma & Catastrophizing Compounded C1/ Still-Considers" and C2 as "Latent-Trait Driven C2/ Extreme Avoiders." Tailored strategies that combine trauma-informed exposure for the former and sensory-adapted engagement for the latter may enhance the uptake of oral healthcare. Broader endogenous indicators should be added in future work to refine subtype boundaries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.