ArticleBMC public health2025
Community-based maternal and perinatal death surveillance and response: a comparative case study of implementation realities from humanitarian contexts.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundImplementation of community-based Maternal and Perinatal Death Surveillance and Response (CB-MPDSR) in crisis-affected settings offers an opportunity to adapt humanitarian programming and mount solutions to directly improve maternal and neonatal health among those most in need. This study aimed to understand factors that influence implementation of CB-MPDSR approaches across diverse humanitarian contexts.
methodsA comparative qualitative case study was conducted in December 2021-July 2022 to assess CB-MPDSR implementation in 4 diverse humanitarian settings: Cox's Bazar (CXB) refugee camps, Ugandan refugee settlements, South Sudan, and Yemen. A scoping review and 39 individual or group semi-structured key informant interviews were conducted. Thematic content analysis was employed to understand the adoption, penetration, and fidelity of CB-MPDSR approaches and elucidate cross-setting learning.
findingsAdoption of CB-MPDSR varied: refugee contexts in CXB and Uganda had well-established systems involving active pregnancy and mortality surveillance and verbal autopsy. In Yemen, implementation was reliant upon passive reporting mechanisms, while implementing partners in South Sudan employed a mix of strategies. Financial, human resources, and socio-cultural dynamics significantly limited implementation, especially the notification and review of perinatal deaths. Strategic engagement of community stakeholders was employed to improve participation and transparency between communities and health systems; however, community trust in the humanitarian health system remains an unresolved issue.
conclusionsCB-MPDSR offers insights into important systemic and cultural factors contributing to mortality within crisis-affected settings. Our results call for more research investment in understanding how to effectively adapt CB-MPDSR and development of operational guidance to assist humanitarian actors in introducing or bolstering CB-MPDSR approaches, so as to support a system reflective of complex realities faced by these diverse and mobile communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.