ArticleBMC public health2025
A qualitative study of former participants' experiences of the Green Prescription program in Aotearoa New Zealand.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effectiveness of a medical exercise prescription to promote physical activity in children: a pragmatic randomized trial in primary care.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Trial
- Models, implementation, and reported outcomes of social prescribing interventions: a scoping review.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPhysical activity promotion through primary care represents a key public health strategy. Aotearoa New Zealand’s Green Prescription (GRx) program, a nationwide primary care-based physical activity intervention, has operated for over 25 years but lacks comprehensive evaluation of participant experiences and long-term impacts.
methodsThis qualitative study used semi-structured interviews with 15 former GRx Otago participants. Interviews explored experiences of the program, perceived impacts on physical activity, mental health, and quality of life, and recommendations for improvement. Data were analyzed using Interpretive Thematic Analysis following Braun and Clarke’s six-step approach.
resultsSix main themes emerged: barriers to engagement, general experiences, mental health experiences, physical activity experiences, quality of life experiences, and recommendations for program improvement. Most participants described increased physical activity levels and mental health improvements following program participation. Key barriers included financial constraints, transportation difficulties, and complex medical conditions. Participants valued the program’s strengths-based approach, social connections, and individually tailored support. Primary recommendations included extending program duration, enhancing in-person support, diversifying activity options, and strengthening community organization partnerships.
conclusionsParticipants described largely positive experiences with the GRx program, suggesting potential for promoting physical activity and associated health benefits. However, significant opportunities exist for enhancement through addressing identified barriers, extending support duration, and developing more comprehensive community partnerships. These findings provide evidence-based strategies for improving primary care-based physical activity interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.