ArticleBMC health services research2025
Disposal practices of unused and expired medications among healthcare practitioners in Ibadan, Nigeria: results from a cross-sectional survey.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Ecopharmacovigilance and Drug Disposal: A Survey of Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices Among Veterinary Healthcare Providers in and Around Gondar City, Ethiopia.Veterinary medicine and science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe improper disposal of unused and expired medications (UEMs) poses significant public health and environmental risks. Healthcare practitioners are pivotal in promoting safe disposal practices, yet their behaviours and educational roles remain underexplored. This study assessed UEM disposal practices among healthcare practitioners in Ibadan, Nigeria, and their engagement in patient education on safe disposal methods.
methodsA cross-sectional survey using validated questionnaire was conducted from September 2023 to February 2024 among 255 healthcare practitioners (65 physicians, 64 hospital pharmacists, and 126 community pharmacists) in Ibadan, Nigeria. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS version 26.0, with associations tested via Pearson’s Chi-square (p < 0.05).
resultsMost practitioners reported possessing UEMs at home (81.5% physicians, 84.4% hospital pharmacists, 73.8% community pharmacists). Improper disposal was prevalent, with 92.3% of physicians, 76.6% of hospital pharmacists, and 78.6% of community pharmacists discarding UEMs in household waste. Years of experience significantly influenced positive disposal perceptions (χ² = 14.00, p = 0.003), with 87.5% of practitioners with over 30 years of experience exhibiting good perceptions compared to 45.5% with 0–10 years. Patient inquiries about disposal were rare (78.0% physicians, 71.8% hospital pharmacists, 69.8% community pharmacists reported “rarely” or “never”), and only 58.7% of community pharmacists had ever educated patients on disposal. Community pharmacists showed the strongest support for a medication retrieval strategy (96.0%), followed by hospital pharmacists (93.8%) and physicians (86.1%).
conclusionsDespite awareness of proper UEM disposal, healthcare practitioners frequently use improper methods, such as household waste disposal, and rarely educate patients. Policy interventions, including standardized disposal protocols and mandatory training, are essential to bridge this gap and enhance safe disposal practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.