ArticleBMC public health2025
Promoting physical activity during recess in small sized elementary school: a pilot study.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of this pilot study was to examine the effect of structured and unstructured recess intervention based on spatial analysis technology on physical activity (PA) levels among children attending a small-sized elementary school.
methodsA small-sized elementary school (4.82 m
resultsDuring structured recess, post-tests demonstrated a significant increase in the duration of moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) for both boys and girls (p < 0.05), as well as significant improvement in vigorous physical activity (VPA) for them (p < 0.05). Significant increases (p < 0.05) in the duration of VPA were shown among boys during unstructured recess; The number of students observed in the added markings spaces increased from 182 to 344; Significant increases (p < 0.05) in the proportion of MVPA were shown in the added markings spaces of the gate and playground.
conclusionsActivity type change to Tabata exercise improved PA during the structured recess of all students. Adding game markings based on spatial analysis technology increased participation number in PA during unstructured recess. This low-cost pilot intervention is expected to be used in the program of recess activities in small-sized elementary schools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.