Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41034813›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2025

Diagnostic accuracy of plain radiographs compared to CT scans in classifying talus injuries.

Reza Fereidooni, Seyed Arman Moein, Seyyed Hamidreza Ayatizadeh, Amirhossein Kamalinia, Mohammad Amin Ahmadi, Seiied Hossein Heidari, Asal Seifaei, Amir Reza Vosoughi, Esmail Rayatdoost

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Reza Fereidooni *Health Policy Research Center, Institute of Health, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Seyed Arman Moein *Research Center for Non-communicable Diseases, Jahrom University of Medical Sciences, Jahrom, Iran.
Seyyed Hamidreza AyatizadehTrauma Research Center, Rajaee (Emtiaz) Trauma Hospital, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Amirhossein KamaliniaOrthopedic & Rehabilitation Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Mohammad Amin AhmadiTrauma Research Center, Rajaee (Emtiaz) Trauma Hospital, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Seiied Hossein HeidariOrthopedic & Rehabilitation Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Asal SeifaeiStudent Research Committee, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Amir Reza VosoughiOrthopedic & Rehabilitation Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Esmail RayatdoostResearch Center for Non-communicable Diseases, Jahrom University of Medical Sciences, Jahrom, Iran. e.rayat.dost@gmail.com.

Funding

the Vice-Chancellor for Research, Jahrom University of Medical Sciences, Jahrom, Iran 402000129
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTalus injuries are clinically significant due to the talus bone's essential function in foot biomechanics and the complexity of its healing process. Although plain radiographs are more accessible and involve lower radiation exposure than CT scans, they often lack sufficient detail for accurate diagnosis. Given their frequent use in initial assessments, this study aims to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of plain radiographs in classifying talus injuries within a patient group with confirmed talar fractures.

methodsSample size determination aimed to adequately represent rare fracture subtypes while resembling real-world prevalence, indicating a minimum of 140 cases. Radiographs of 159 patients with talus fractures were randomly selected from a database. Two authors interpreted CT scans to establish an accurate gold standard diagnosis. Three diagnosticians assessed the radiographs independently, searching for 10 talus injuries and fracture characteristics. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and their confidence intervals were calculated for each injury type and overall injuries. Individual and pooled diagnosticians' responses were used to compute diagnostic metrics.

resultsDiagnosticians achieved only moderate interrater agreement, with a Kappa coefficient of 0.445 (p < 0.001). The overall sensitivity of plain radiographs for detecting talus injuries was 60% (95% CI: 59.10%-61.87%). Sensitivity for identifying fracture characteristics, such as comminution and displacement was lower, at around 53%. Fractures of the head, body, and neck exhibited variable sensitivities, with talus neck fractures demonstrating the highest sensitivity at 76.73% followed by head (52.78%) and body (51.92%). The lateral process, posterior process, and medial tubercle of talus displayed sensitivity rates ranging from 51.52 to 55.56%, while osteochondral fractures showed the lowest sensitivity at 33.33%. Sensitivities for tibiotalar (82.22%) and talonavicular (75%) dislocations were satisfactory compared to subtalar dislocations (57.36%). Hawkins type 2 yielded the lowest sensitivity at 29.76% (95% CI: 25.66%-33.86%).

conclusionWhile plain radiographs are accessible for detecting certain talus injuries, they fall short in precisely classifying injury locations and identifying details, such as displacement and comminution. CT scans are recommended when there is high clinical suspicion, as they offer greater accuracy for complex and subtle injuries. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Indexed as

Fractures, BoneTalusTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityYoung AdultCT scanDiagnostic accuracyRadiographRadiographyRoentgenogramTalusTalus fractureX-ray

Identifiers

PMID41034813
PMCPMC12487131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.