ArticleBMC public health2025
Community engagement approaches and influencing factors in Aedes mosquito management: a case study from North Queensland, Australia.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimCommunity engagement plays a crucial role in preventing and managing Aedes-borne mosquito disease outbreaks, such as dengue. There is limited research on the engagement approaches used in high-income country contexts with existing research suggesting a preference for top-down vector control relying on one-way communication to engage and mobilize at-risk communities. The reasons behind why authorities use certain engagement approaches over others are underexplored. This study explores the community engagement approaches used in Aedes mosquito management in Townsville, Australia, and the factors influencing the choice of these approaches.
methodsThe study used a case study design employing two qualitative methodologies: semi-structured key informant interviews (N = 15) and a review of key documents (N = 13). Both inductive and deductive approaches were used to thematically analyse the data.
resultsA range of approaches were used to engage the community in Aedes mosquito management. From mass media campaigns and door-to-door inspections, to engaging the community in Wolbachia mosquito-releases, and helping authorities with indoor spraying during outbreak response. The factors influencing the choice of these approaches included legal obligations and regulatory compliance, vector control norms, leadership beliefs, human and financial resourcing.
conclusionsThis study provides new insights into why authorities adopt specific community engagement approaches in Aedes mosquito management, within a high-income country context. It identifies barriers to enhancing community engagement and suggests strategies for addressing them in future planning. These findings are particularly relevant given the increasing Aedes mosquito risk in similar high-income country settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.