ArticleBMC ophthalmology2025
Construction of a predictive model for retinopathy of prematurity using machine learning algorithms.
Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRetinopathy of prematurity (ROP) has emerged as one of the leading causes of visual impairment or blindness among newborn infants worldwide. The purpose of this study was to develop a predictive model for ROP using machine learning methods.
methodsA retrospective study was conducted on 586 neonates admitted to the Department of Neonatology at the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University from January 2019 to January 2024, who met the inclusion criteria and underwent ROP screening.1.ROP-related risk factors were collected by reviewing electronic medical records during hospitalization and follow-up outpatient visits.2.Lasso regression was applied to screen ROP-related risk factors, identifying significant predictors. Seven machine learning models were constructed using these predictors. Model performance was evaluated and compared based on metrics including Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC), accuracy, precision, sensitivity, specificity, F1-score, and Kappa coefficient.
results1. Lasso regression screened 109 ROP-related risk factors and identified 46 significant predictors. These factors were used to construct seven machine learning models.2. Among the models, the random forest (RF) algorithm demonstrated optimal performance, with the following metrics: Training set: AUC: 1.000; accuracy: 99.7%; precision: 99.7%; specificity: 99.7%; Sensitivity: 99.7%; F1-score: 0.997; Kappa coefficient: 0.994.Testing set: AUC: 0.981; accuracy: 95.7%; precision: 92.3%; specificity: 99.3%; Sensitivity: 66.7%; F1-score: 0.774; Kappa coefficient: 0.751.
conclusionThe RF predictive model based on 46 significant ROP-related risk factors exhibits strong predictive value for ROP occurrence. This model provides a useful tool for early clinical identification of high-risk ROP populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.