ArticleBMC ecology and evolution2025
Low population genetic structure in five Chilean Nothofagus species and high fluctuating asymmetry in Nothofagus pumilio x N. antarctica putative hybrids.
Article in BMC ecology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFollowing historic natural disturbances, interspecific hybridization has been documented between several Nothofagus species in Chilean forests. While hybridization can contribute to survival by enhancing genetic diversity, it may lead to developmental instability, reflected in higher leaf fluctuating asymmetry. Our goal was to investigate if hybrid individuals between N. pumilio and N. antarctica had developmental instabilities observable through high leaf fluctuating asymmetry and to examine evidence of potential hybridization and population genetic structure across five Nothofagus species.
resultsWe collected N. pumilio, N. antarctica, and putative hybrid leaves for morphological analysis and chloroplast DNA sequencing. We also performed population genetic analysis on additional Nothofagus species (N. pumilio, N. antarctica, N. betuloides, N. dombeyi, and N. nitida) using microsatellite markers (eight loci). The putative hybrids with intermediate phenotypes displayed significantly higher fluctuating asymmetry than morphologically unambiguous N. pumilio and N. antarctica. Yet despite clear phenotypic differences, N. pumilio and N. antarctica shared cpDNA and had almost identical microsatellite composition. Our microsatellite analysis of five Nothofagus species found high allelic variation within species and subpopulations but low genetic structure between species and populations.
conclusionsOur findings reveal possible developmental instability in putative N. pumilio and N. antarctica hybrids characterized by leaf morphology. Though nuclear ITS sequences have phylogenetically differentiated pure Nothofagus taxa, we found little to no genetic differentiation between sympatric or allopatric Nothofagus species from microsatellite data, particularly N. pumilio and N. antarctica. This is a surprising result given the clear morphological and biogeographical differences between the Chilean Nothofagus. While N. pumilio and N. antarctica are named species, matching the ecological species concept, whole genome analyses is needed to test if they are distinct enough to be classified as separate species under the phylogenetic species concept.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.