ArticleThe Journal of international medical research2025
Development and validation of a predictive nomogram for sepsis-associated severe anemia.
Article in The Journal of international medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Hematological Safety of Contezolid versus Linezolid in Stage 5 Chronic Kidney Disease: An Active-Comparator New-User Retrospective Cohort Study.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ObjectiveThis study aimed to develop and validate a predictive risk nomogram for sepsis-associated severe anemia.MethodsA prediction model was built using data from 252 sepsis patients in a single institution (January 2022 to December 2023). Severe anemia was defined as a hemoglobin level <60 g/L. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression was used to identify key predictors, and multivariable logistic regression was used to construct the nomogram. Model performance was assessed via the receiver operating characteristic curve (C-index), calibration plots, and decision curve analysis. Internal validation was performed using bootstrapping.ResultsPredictors included age, length of intensive care unit stay, nutritional method, and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score. The model demonstrated good discrimination (C-index: 0.8848) and calibration, with high internal validation performance. Decision curve analysis indicated optimal clinical utility at risk thresholds between 5% and 75%.ConclusionsThe constructed nomogram, incorporating age, length of intensive care unit stay, nutritional method, and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, provides a practical tool for early individualized care in sepsis patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.