ArticleThe Journal of international medical research2025
Severe delayed coagulopathy caused by cefoperazone/sulbactam: A case report.
Article in The Journal of international medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This case report described a suspected severe coagulopathy attributed to cefoperazone/sulbactam, and this adverse reaction might be associated with the inhibition of the vitamin K cycle by cefoperazone/sulbactam, leading to vitamin K deficiency within the body. We reported a patient diagnosed with bacterial pneumonia, who received cefoperazone/sulbactam during hospitalization. The patient was administered cefoperazone/sulbactam via intravenous infusion at a dose of 1.5 g every 8 h for a consecutive treatment period of 23 days. On the 26th day, the patient developed a serious adverse reaction characterized by prolonged clotting time. After treatment with vitamin K1, the coagulation parameters significantly improved by the 28th day (prothrombin time decreased by 88.4%, activated partial thromboplastin time decreased by 61.1%, and international normalized ratio decreased by 88.5%). The Naranjo assessment score was 5, suggesting that the patient's coagulation disorder could be related to the use of cefoperazone/sulbactam. This report highlights that patients at high risk of bleeding should be vigilant about the coagulopathy caused by cefoperazone/sulbactam- and extend the duration of coagulopathy monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.