Trial reportPediatric research2026
Neonatal morbidity in early-onset fetal growth restriction with and without anticoagulant therapy.
Trial report in Pediatric research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in reducing neonatal morbidity in pregnancies with early-onset fetal growth restriction (FGR).
methodsA phase III, multicenter, triple-blind, parallel-arm randomized clinical trial conducted in two university hospitals in Spain. Singleton pregnancies with early-onset placental FGR (20 + 0-31 + 6 weeks at diagnosis) were randomized to receive bemiparin (3500 IU/0.2 mL/day) or placebo from diagnosis to delivery. The primary neonatal outcome was morbidity up to hospital discharge, assessed using the Morbidity Assessment Index for Newborns (MAIN) score. Analyses followed an intention-to-treat approach.
resultsFifty patients were randomized (25 per arm), with 49 included in the final analysis (23 LMWH, 26 placebo). Median gestational ages at inclusion were 28.7 weeks (LMWH) and 28.4 weeks (placebo). No significant differences were observed in MAIN scores between groups (171.5 vs. 290; p = 0.887; adjusted median difference 139.1 [95% CI -88.4 to 319.8]). NICU stay lengths were also similar (9 vs. 6.5 days; p = 0.738; adjusted median difference 1.08 [95% CI -0.74 to 13.4]).
conclusionProphylactic LMWH started at diagnosis of early-onset FGR does not decrease neonatal morbidity or NICU stay duration. IMPACT: Prophylactic LMWH started at the diagnosis of early-onset FGR does not decrease neonatal morbidity or NICU stay duration. Its design is a randomized, triple-blind clinical trial, which provides high-quality evidence. LMWH is often prescribed during pregnancy for various indications, and in the absence of effective alternatives, it is increasingly used empirically in such cases. Our findings do not support its use for reducing perinatal morbidity or NICU admission duration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41034645What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.