ArticleMolecular psychiatry2026
Reward circuit function and treatment outcome following vALIC deep brain stimulation in treatment-resistant depression.
Article in Molecular psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Depression is associated with abnormal functioning of the reward circuit. Several deep brain stimulation (DBS) targets for treatment-resistant depression (TRD) directly modulate white matter bundles of the reward circuit. Here we investigated whether baseline reward processing in the brain is associated with ventral anterior limb of the internal capsule (vALIC) DBS outcome and whether vALIC DBS changes neural activity in the reward circuit. We studied fifteen patients with TRD who performed a monetary reward task during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) before vALIC DBS surgery, after DBS parameter optimization, and during a sham-controlled crossover phase. DBS devices were switched off during scanning for MRI safety reasons. Additionally, fifteen matched healthy controls were investigated twice to account for test-retest effects. We investigated brain responses to reward anticipation, loss anticipation, reward feedback and loss feedback. Results showed that lower baseline nucleus accumbens activation during loss anticipation and higher baseline caudate nucleus and midcingulate cortex activation during reward feedback processing were associated with worse DBS outcome. No significant changes in reward processing were observed following vALIC DBS in comparison to healthy controls or after active compared to sham stimulation. Instead, increased middle frontal gyrus responses following DBS to loss feedback was associated with better DBS outcome. These results suggest that DBS efficacy in TRD is related to individual differences in reward circuit functioning at baseline and to changes in middle frontal gyrus responses following DBS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41034506What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.