ArticleScientific reports2025
Low-Intensity ultrasound for controlled excitation and suppression in rat sciatic nerve.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Low-intensity, low-frequency ultrasound has shown promise for neuromodulation, particularly for influencing peripheral neural activity. However, the precise parameters required to modulate neuronal activity remain poorly understood, limiting its broader application. Here, we investigated the effects of varying the sonication duration (SD) and duty cycle (DC) on motor neuronal responses in the rat sciatic nerve, with a focus on understanding how cumulative energy exposure influences the activation or suppression of peripheral neural activity during ultrasound neuromodulation. We applied low-intensity, low-frequency ultrasound to the rat sciatic nerve in vivo at different sonication durations and duty cycles. The cumulative energy exposure is calculated as the product of the spatial-peak pulse-average intensity, SD, and DC. Electromyographic (EMG) activity in the gastrocnemius muscle was measured, and the thermal effects were monitored to ensure a non-thermal application. Our findings demonstrate that higher cumulative energy exposure suppresses EMG activity in the gastrocnemius muscle (innervated by the sciatic nerve). However, lower cumulative energy exposure enhances motor stimulation. Notably, the ultrasound-induced EMG changes persisted for 5 min post-sonication - three to five times longer than the application duration - emphasizing the therapeutic potential of ultrasound for precise neural control. Interestingly, our results show a switch from excitation to suppression of electrically evoked EMG activity following ultrasound sonication depending on the acquired cumulative energy. This study establishes a safe parameter space for prolonged neuromodulation, demonstrating its potential for therapeutic applications that can precisely modulate peripheral nervous system activity for treating neuropathies and chronic pain. These findings contribute to the development of ultrasound-based treatments, offering a novel and controllable method for peripheral nerve stimulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.