ArticleScientific reports2025
Gas concentration prediction based on SSA algorithm with CNN-BiLSTM-attention.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Intelligent monitoring and CNN-based performance evaluation of borehole-pipe-pump gas drainage systems in coal mines.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate prediction of coal mine gas concentration is a crucial prerequisite for preventing gas exceed and disasters. However, the existing methods still suffer from issues such as low data utilization, difficulty in effectively integrating multivariate nonlinear spatiotemporal features, and poor generalization capability when achieving relatively high prediction accuracy but requiring longer prediction durations. To address these challenges, this study focuses on a tunneling face in a Shanxi coal mine and proposes a novel hybrid deep learning model (CNN-BiLSTM-Attention). The model employs a 1D-CNN to extract local spatial features of gas concentration, temperature, wind speed, rock pressure, and CO concentration, utilizes BiLSTM to model bidirectional temporal dependencies, and incorporates an attention mechanism to dynamically weight critical features, such as sudden changes in gas concentration. Additionally, the sparserow search algorithm (SSA) was applied to automatically optimize hyperparameters, including the number of CNN filters and BiLSTM hidden units. The results demonstrate that the proposed SCBA model achieves an RMSE of 0.0171 and MAPE of 0.084. Compared to mainstream models such as attention-LSTM, SSA-LSTM-aAttention, and rTransformer-LSTM, the RMSE was improved by 23.3%, 4.4%, and 30.2%, respectively, while the MAPE was improved by 38.7%, 14.3%, and 43.62%, respectively, indicating superior prediction accuracy. To validate the contribution of each module, ablation experiments were conducted by sequentially removing the CNN, BiLSTM, and Attention components for error analysis, confirming the necessity of the multi-module collaborative mechanism. In multi-step predictions, the proposed model exhibits better generalization capability as the prediction horizon increases, with the slowest error growth, providing insights for enhancing gas concentration prediction generalization. The model achieves the smallest error at 20 time steps, laying a foundation for subsequent anomaly analysis and offering miners sufficient safety evacuation time, thereby establishing a reliable basis for real-time gas disaster early warning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.