ArticleScientific reports2025
Digital literacy's impact on digital village participation in rural left-behind women through serial mediation of political trust and self-efficacy.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Why Hide AI Use? Psychological Configurations and Explainable Machine Learning Evidence from Marketing Work.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Reimagining community health nursing: a qualitative participatory action research study of nurse-led primary healthcare innovation in rural Saudi Arabia.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Individual digital literacy, area-level digital exclusion, and inequalities in exercise participation among middle-aged and older adults: evidence from China.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- An efficiency assessment of digital technology empowering healthy aging in China: an empirical study of the "internet plus nursing services" pilot program based on the DEA model.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Digital technology empowers model innovation in chronic disease management in Chinese grassroots communities.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rural left-behind women, as important potential participants in Digital Village Development, face multiple challenges including limited educational resources, weak digital skills, constrained economic conditions, and traditional socio-cultural barriers. These factors severely restrict the improvement of their digital literacy and their effective participation in digital village initiatives. Drawing upon the Socio-Technical Systems (STS) theory to understand the interplay between technology and social systems, and based on the Stimulus-Organism-Response (SOR) theory to explore individual psychological processes, this study focuses on two key psychological variables-political trust and self-efficacy-to systematically explore how digital literacy influences the digital village participation of rural left-behind women through these intrinsic psychological mechanisms. The study aims to address the theoretical gaps in digital empowerment for marginalized groups and to provide solid theoretical and empirical support for promoting digital inclusion and targeted digital empowerment policies. This study utilizes field survey data from a major project funded by the National Social Science Fund of China. The sample was selected using a stratified random sampling method from several townships and villages in Shaanxi Province, yielding 1,083 valid questionnaires with an effective response rate of 91.3%. A Tobit regression model was applied to analyze the impact of digital literacy on participation in digital village initiatives. A panel conditional quantile regression was used to test the heterogeneity of this effect across different participation levels. Furthermore, a chained mediation model was employed to examine the mediating pathways of political trust and self-efficacy through which digital literacy affects digital village participation. The methodological framework is grounded in the SOR theory, providing an in-depth analysis of how digital technology stimuli influence participatory behavior through psychological states. The Tobit regression results show that digital literacy significantly enhances participation in Digital Village Development, the digital economy, and digital governance, but its effect on participation in digital benefit services is not significant. Conditional quantile regression reveals significant heterogeneity in the influence of digital literacy across different levels of participation. The chained mediation analysis indicates a significant direct effect of digital literacy (coefficient = 0.191, accounting for 60.72% of the total effect), alongside three indirect paths through political trust (17.17%), self-efficacy (16.53%), and the combined effect of political trust and self-efficacy (5.58%).These results reveal a complex multiple mediation mechanism through which digital literacy influences digital village participation among rural left-behind women. This study fills a research gap concerning the relationship between digital literacy and digital village participation among rural left-behind women and expands the application of the SOR theory in the context of Digital Village Development. The theoretical model proposed is not only suitable for the rural Chinese context but also holds universal significance for understanding digital empowerment mechanisms in marginalized populations. The findings emphasize that, beyond improving digital skills, enhancing political trust and self-efficacy is equally crucial. Accordingly, policymakers should design differentiated training and support strategies to comprehensively improve the digital literacy and participation capabilities of left-behind women, thereby facilitating the digital transformation of rural economies and societies. The sample of this study is limited to specific regions, which may affect the generalizability of the findings. The analytical models do not encompass all potential influencing factors, and the complex role of socio-cultural contexts requires further exploration. Future research should expand the sample scope, incorporate multidimensional factors, and deepen the understanding and verification of digital empowerment mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.