ArticleScientific reports2025
Cultural differences in self-reported empathy in Indonesia.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Empathy, comprising cognitive and affective components, is linked to numerous individual and societal benefits, including enhanced well-being and prosocial behaviours. However, empathy might also hinder societal flourishing due to biases resulting from factors like social closeness. This study explored cultural variation in empathy within Indonesia, a non-WEIRD context with diverse ethnicities, religions, and social structures. We hypothesized that cultural factors such as ethnicity, primary residence, religious beliefs, and social class would predict empathy differences. Using standardised questionnaires, we assessed helping behaviour, situational empathic concern, directed empathic concern, and personal distress in 2869 Indonesian adults. Regression analyses revealed that gender, age, ethnicity, residence, religion, and perceived social class significantly predicted empathy components. Notably, Javanese and Sundanese participants reported higher empathy levels than Minangkabau, and Muslims showed more empathy than other religious groups. Additionally, higher perceived social status correlated with increased helping behaviour and emotional empathy, but it also correlated with lower personal distress. These findings highlight the complex interplay of cultural factors in shaping empathy, with implications for understanding socioemotional dynamics across diverse societies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.