ArticleScientific reports2025
Efficacy of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy with chitosan nanoparticles for decontamination of dental implants contaminated with Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Indocyanine green doped with chitosan nanoparticles based antimicrobial photodynamic therapy in periodontitis patients: A randomized clinical trial.World journal of experimental medicine · 2026Trial
- Nano-warfare in the oral cavity: antimicrobial strategies and mechanisms in nanodentistry.Odontology · 2026Review
- Biomimetic nanotherapy forInternational journal of pharmaceutics: X · 2025Article
- In Vitro Evaluation of Plant Antimicrobials AgainstPolymers · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to assess the efficacy of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) with chitosan nanoparticles (CNPs) for decontamination of dental implants inoculated with Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans (A. actinomycetemcomitans). In this in vitro study, CNPs containing indocyanine green (ICG) were synthesized and characterized. Sandblasted large-grit acid-etched (SLA) titanium implants (n = 54) were inoculated with A. actinomycetemcomitans, and randomly assigned to 6 groups (n = 9) for decontamination: (I) negative control (PBS rinse for 60 s), (II) positive control [exposure to 0.2% chlorhexidine (CHX) for 5 min], (III) exposure to 0.25 mg/mL ICG at 37 °C for 5 min, (IV) exposure to 0.25 mg/mL ICG followed by 808 nm diode laser irradiation for 60 s, (V) exposure to 0.25 mg/mL ICG-loaded CNPs, (VI) exposure to 0.25 mg/mL ICG-loaded CNPs followed by 808 nm diode laser irradiation for 60 s. The A. actinomycetemcomitans colonies were counted, and data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Tamhane test (alpha = 0.05). The test groups showed a significant reduction in colony count compared to the negative control (P < 0.05). Laser plus ICG-loaded CNPs and CHX had comparably the highest decontamination efficacy. This study demonstrated that aPDT with ICG-loaded CNPs significantly reduced the A. actinomycetemcomitans colony count on dental implants, showing comparable efficacy to CHX.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.