ArticleScientific reports2025
An interpretable hybrid deep learning framework for gastric cancer diagnosis using histopathological imaging.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hybrid diagnostic framework for bone cancer detection using deep learning and radiomics analysis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Comprehensive Overview of Gastric Cancer Immunohistochemistry: Key Biomarkers, Advanced Detection Methods, and Perspectives.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Transforming Gastric Biopsy Diagnostics: Integrating Omics Technologies and Artificial Intelligence.Biomedicines · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The increasing incidence of gastric cancer and the complexity of histopathological image interpretation present significant challenges for accurate and timely diagnosis. Manual assessments are often subjective and time-intensive, leading to a growing demand for reliable, automated diagnostic tools in digital pathology. This study proposes a hybrid deep learning approach combining convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and Transformer-based architectures to classify gastric histopathological images with high precision. The model is designed to enhance feature representation and spatial contextual understanding, particularly across diverse tissue subtypes and staining variations. Three publicly available datasets-GasHisSDB, TCGA-STAD, and NCT-CRC-HE-100 K-were utilized to train and evaluate the model. Image patches were preprocessed through stain normalization, augmented using standard techniques, and fed into the hybrid model. The CNN backbone extracts local spatial features, while the Transformer encoder captures global context. Performance was assessed using fivefold cross-validation and evaluated through accuracy, F1-score, AUC, and Grad-CAM-based interpretability. The proposed model achieved a 99.2% accuracy on the GasHisSDB dataset, with a macro F1-score of 0.991 and AUC of 0.996. External validation on TCGA-STAD and NCT-CRC-HE-100 K further confirmed the model's robustness. Grad-CAM visualizations highlighted biologically relevant regions, demonstrating interpretability and alignment with expert annotations. This hybrid deep learning framework offers a reliable, interpretable, and generalizable tool for gastric cancer diagnosis. Its superior performance and explainability highlight its clinical potential for deployment in digital pathology workflows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.