ArticleScientific reports2025
Long term health related quality of life among individuals after COVID 19 recovery in a multicentric community based study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- EQ-5D-5L population norms for Singapore: a household survey-based analysis.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- A health resort-based intervention reduces insomnia with minimal changes in quality of life in COVID-19 survivors and non-COVID-19 controls.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has had a profound and far-reaching impact on global health, resulting in significant morbidity and mortality across populations. Long term post COVID-19 conditions can include neurological symptoms, chronic fatigue, and mental health disorders, which collectively contribute to a deterioration in health-related quality of life. This study aims assess long-term HRQoL using EuroQol (EQ 5D 5L) among COVID-19 patients in community settings. This study conducted a multicentric, community-based cross-sectional design to assess the long-term HRQoL among patients who have recovered from COVID-19. The study included participants aged above 18 years from two cities Delhi and Bhubaneswar. Descriptive statistics of categorical variables were presented in frequency and percentage, while continuous variables were presented in mean ± SD. The censored regression analysis has been performed by reporting beta coefficients and significance by (p < 0.05). The EQ-5D-5L index scores indicated a mean of 0.89 (95% CI 0.87, 0.91) for Delhi, compared to a lower mean score of 0.66 (95% CI 0.62, 0.71) for Bhubaneswar. Age was negatively correlated with health states, showing a crude coefficient of - 0.003 (95% CI - 0.005, 0.001) with a significant p value of 0.002, although the adjusted coefficient was - 0.002 (95% CI - 0.005, 0.001), indicating a loss of significance when controlling for other factors. The emphasizes the health-related quality of life of the COVID-19 recovered patients and challenges in their daily living. The study descriptively highlighting the quality-of-life and in association with age, educational status, marital status, health insurance availability, and treatment setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.