ArticleCommunications medicine2025
Surgical and transcatheter aortic valve replacement after orthotopic heart transplantation: a case series.
Article in Communications medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAortic valve dysfunction is a rare but relevant long-term complication after orthotopic heart transplantation (HTX). Treatment options include surgical (SAVR) and transcatheter (TAVR) aortic valve replacement, but evidence is limited to the level of case reports.
methodsA total of 2054 patients underwent HTX between 1986 and 2023 at the Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité, Berlin, Germany, 16 of them underwent aortic valve replacement (SAVR, N = 7; TAVR, N = 9) after HTX. In this case series we report on the outcomes of these 16 patients (age 29-73 years).
resultsIsolated aortic valve regurgitation occurs in 5 (31%) patients (TAVR N = 1, SAVR N = 4), while 11 patients (69%) suffer from aortic valve stenosis. Severe pre-procedural heart failure is present in 38% of the patients. Thirty-day mortality is 0%, in-hospital mortality is N = 2 (22%) patients due to sepsis, both patients were severely decompensated prior to TAVR. An uneventful postoperative course occurs in 8 (50%) patients, the patient's functional status improves in 12 (75%) cases.
conclusionTAVR is the increasingly preferred treatment for aortic valve dysfunction after heart transplantation, but SAVR is a feasible alternative for individuals who are ineligible for TAVR. Further information is needed on the appropriate procedural timing in these high-risk patients.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.