ArticleScientific reports2025
Antinociceptive effect of Arvelexin in male mouse models.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This research evaluated the analgesic properties of Arvelexin through different models of nociception. Different concentrations of Arvelexin (50, 100, 150, and 200 µg/kg body weight) were administered to male mice, and their responses to pain were assessed using various evaluation techniques. The results were compared with those from mice receiving treatments of acetylsalicylic acid or morphine, with and without the addition of naloxone. Furthermore, to explore the impact of Arvelexin on pain modulation systems, additional tests using capsaicin and glutamate focused on its influence on vanilloid and glutamatergic pathways. The research illustrated a significant, dose-related reduction in pain during the acetic acid-induced writhing assay, with a peak decrease of 75.1% observed at 200 µg/kg body weight. Similarly, Arvelexin increased the delay before pain response in the hot plate test by 69.5% at the same dosage. In tests of formalin-induced paw licking, Arvelexin notably reduced pain in both the neurogenic and inflammatory phases, effects which were negated by naloxone, suggesting opioid system engagement. Furthermore, the compound effectively inhibited neurogenic pain triggered by capsaicin and glutamate. ELISA results showed that Arvelexin markedly reduced levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1β, TNF-α, and IFN-γ) in the serum of mice at 100 and 200 µg/kg. The results demonstrate that Arvelexin has analgesic effects mediated by both central and peripheral pathways, involving interactions with vanilloid receptors, opioid receptors, and elements of the glutamatergic system. While findings suggest significant pain relief, the exclusion of female mice may limit the applicability of results across sexes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.