Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41034262›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Describing variability of intensively collected longitudinal ordinal data with latent spline models.

Mark Lunt, David A Selby, William G Dixon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mark LuntCentre for Epidemiology Versus Arthritis, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
David A SelbyDepartment of Data Science and its Applications, German Research Centre for Artificial Intelligence (DFKI), Kaiserslautern, Germany. david.selby@dfki.de.
William G DixonCentre for Epidemiology Versus Arthritis, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Funding

Centre for Epidemiology Versus Arthritis, University of Manchester 21744
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Population health studies increasingly collect longitudinal, patient-reported symptom data via mobile devices, offering unique insights into experiences outside clinical settings, such as pain, fatigue or mood. However, such data present challenges due to ordinal measurement scales, irregular sampling and temporal autocorrelation. This paper introduces two novel summary measures for analysing ordinal outcomes: (1) the mean absolute deviation from the median (MADM) for cross-sectional analyses and (2) the mean absolute deviation from expectation (MADE) for longitudinal data. The latter is based on a latent cumulative model with penalized splines, enabling smooth transitions between irregular time points while accounting for the ordinal nature of the data. Unlike black-box machine learning approaches, this method is interpretable, computationally efficient and easy to implement in standard statistical software. Through simulations, we demonstrate that the proposed measures outperform standard methods when the assumptions of normality or stationarity are violated. Application to real-world data from a national smartphone study, Cloudy with a Chance of Pain, highlights the utility of these measures in characterising symptom variability and trends over time. The methods developed here provide intuitive tools for analysing patient-reported outcomes in longitudinal studies, with potential applications in prediction modelling, causal discovery and evaluation of interventions.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalCross-Sectional StudiesHumansLongitudinal StudiesMachine LearningPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresSmartphone

Identifiers

PMID41034262
PMCPMC12488869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.