ArticleScientific data2025
A generated image repository of aging faces.
Article in Scientific data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A generated image repository of aging faces.Scientific data · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Faces are a rich source of information for humans and a substantial amount of behavioral science research uses face stimuli to assess person perception. Unfortunately, this body of research is limited by an overreliance on young, predominantly white faces normed on young adult perceivers. To address these limitations, we created an open-access database of AI-generated faces that represents the same individuals at three life stages (young adulthood, middle age, and older adulthood) including equal numbers of males and females. Using advanced generative algorithms, the approach digitally aged 62 young individuals, thus preserving identity-specific features while realistically portraying age-related changes. The resulting database comprises 186 images. Each image has been age-normed and validated for authenticity. Although the database will be useful for many research questions, the stimuli are especially well-suited for research on age comparisons because the same individuals can be presented at different ages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.