ArticleScientific reports2025
PCF-VAE: posterior collapse free variational autoencoder for de novo drug design.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Discovering interpretable drug formulation behavior patterns via a mechanistic-augmented conditional variational autoencoder.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Generative Artificial Intelligence Transitions Pharmaceutical Development from Empirical Screening to Predictive Molecular Design and Clinical Trial Optimization.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence-driven drug discovery: a deep learning paradigm shift in pharmaceutical research and development.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Generating novel molecular structures with desired pharmacological and physicochemical properties is challenging due to the vast chemical space, complex optimization requirements, predictive limitations of models, and data scarcity. This study focuses on investigating the problem of posterior collapse in variational autoencoders, a deep learning technique used for de novo molecular design. Various generative variational autoencoders were employed to map molecule structures to a continuous latent space and vice versa, evaluating their performance as structure generators. Most state-of-the-art approaches suffer from posterior collapse, limiting the diversity of generated molecules. To address this challenge, a novel approach termed PCF-VAE was introduced to mitigate the issue of posterior collapse, reduce the complexity of SMILES representations, and enhance diversity in molecule generation. In comparison to state-of-the-art models, PCF-VAE has been evaluated and compared in the MOSES benchmark at different diversity levels. Depending on the diversity level, PCF-VAE has a validity of 98.01% at D = 1, 97.10% at D = 2, and 95.01% at D = 3. It is important to note that PCF-VAE effectively generates molecules with a 100% unique structure. Both intDiv and intDiv2 are measures of internal diversity; intDiv2 ranges from 85.87 to 86.33% and intDiv ranges from 85.87 to 89.01%. Additionally, at D = 1, D = 2, and D = 3, PCF-VAE generates 93.77%, 94.71%, and 95.01% novel molecules, respectively. The results indicate that this research provides valuable insights into the challenges of molecular generation and contributes to the design of novel molecules with desired properties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.