ArticleScientific reports2025
Synergistic effect of cattle bone and rice husk ash on mechanical and microstructural properties of cement mortar.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The production of cement is growing every year due to its higher consumption in the construction industries. Several studies have been carried out that focus on the possibility of alternative cementing materials such as Industrial and agricultural wastes. Rice husk is one of such agricultural residues and cattle bone is animal waste that are available but didn't get much attention as alternative cementing material. This study aimed to investigate the effect of partial replacement of cement by combining cattle bone ash and rice husk ash mix in cement mortar at 0%, 5% 10% 15% and 20% by volume of cement. The workability test, compressive strength, Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity, water absorption, and sulfate attack tests were conducted for different curing ages (3, 7, 28, 56, and 90 day). In addition, the morphology scanning electron microscopy (SEM), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), differential thermal analysis (DTA), fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) surface area test, complete silicate analysis test was conducted. Compressive strength increases with an increment of from 0 to 10% replacement at 28 days of curing from 31.5 to 45.9 MPa and slightly decreased beyond 15-20% replacement with 39.9 MPa and 30.6 MPa. The result revealed that the mechanical performance of mortar indicated enhancement of calcium silicate hydrate gel, thus reduce the porosity of cement matric. Under scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) image, mortar sample possessed a dense matrix with a widespread presence of calcium silicate hydrate (C-S-H) gels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.