Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41034257›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Synergistic effect of cattle bone and rice husk ash on mechanical and microstructural properties of cement mortar.

Bahiru Bewket Mitikie, Teshome Anteneh Wubetie, Walied A Elsaigh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bahiru Bewket MitikieDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Building Science, University of South Africa, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6757-7478
Teshome Anteneh WubetieDepartment of Civil Engineering, Assosa University, Assosa, Ethiopia. teshumarkos27@gmail.com.
Walied A ElsaighDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Building Science, University of South Africa, Johannesburg, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The production of cement is growing every year due to its higher consumption in the construction industries. Several studies have been carried out that focus on the possibility of alternative cementing materials such as Industrial and agricultural wastes. Rice husk is one of such agricultural residues and cattle bone is animal waste that are available but didn't get much attention as alternative cementing material. This study aimed to investigate the effect of partial replacement of cement by combining cattle bone ash and rice husk ash mix in cement mortar at 0%, 5% 10% 15% and 20% by volume of cement. The workability test, compressive strength, Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity, water absorption, and sulfate attack tests were conducted for different curing ages (3, 7, 28, 56, and 90 day). In addition, the morphology scanning electron microscopy (SEM), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), differential thermal analysis (DTA), fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) surface area test, complete silicate analysis test was conducted. Compressive strength increases with an increment of from 0 to 10% replacement at 28 days of curing from 31.5 to 45.9 MPa and slightly decreased beyond 15-20% replacement with 39.9 MPa and 30.6 MPa. The result revealed that the mechanical performance of mortar indicated enhancement of calcium silicate hydrate gel, thus reduce the porosity of cement matric. Under scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) image, mortar sample possessed a dense matrix with a widespread presence of calcium silicate hydrate (C-S-H) gels.

Indexed as

Bone ashDurabilityMechanical propertiesMicrostructureRice husk ash

Identifiers

PMID41034257
PMCPMC12488898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.